A · Integration 008 / 2026 GitHub · Issues · PRs · Docs Est. read 2 min

Search GitHub issues and docs with AI.

Archively connects to GitHub and turns every issue, pull request, README, and wiki page across your repos into one searchable system you can ask in plain English. Built for founders and ops teams who need to know what was decided, what got shipped, and what broke — without learning GitHub's search syntax or pinging engineering for the third time today.

Join the waitlist See how it reads GitHub →
ISSUE #427 Login regression PR #1893 Auth refactor README Setup guide WIKI Architecture overview DISCUSSION RFC database RELEASE v2.4 changelog ISSUE #427 Login regression PR #1893 Auth refactor README Setup guide WIKI Architecture overview DISCUSSION RFC database RELEASE v2.4 changelog
— The problem

The answer is in GitHub. Engineering knows where.

Every bug, every shipped feature, every architectural call your team ever made lives in a GitHub issue, PR, or README. The trouble is: only the engineers who wrote them know how to find them — and only sometimes.

01
GitHub search wants exact syntax.
`is:issue is:closed label:bug` works fine if you already know what you're looking for. Founders and ops people don't. They want to ask "did we ever fix the SSO timeout?" and get the answer, not write a query.
02
Documentation lives in five places.
README in the repo. Setup guide in the wiki. Architecture decisions in `/docs`. RFCs in Discussions. Release notes in tags. The same piece of knowledge gets written, half-updated, and contradicted across all five.
03
Closed issues hold the real story.
Why was this approach abandoned? What did we try in 2023 that didn't work? The answer is in a closed issue with 60 comments nobody re-reads. Engineering re-litigates the same decision twice a year.
— The solution

Grep through every repo. Ask Archively once.

Connect GitHub once. Archively reads every issue, pull request, README, wiki page, and discussion across the repos you give it access to and turns the lot into one searchable layer indexed by meaning. Ask plain questions like "what did we decide about retry logic last quarter?" and get the answer with the original issue or PR linked. Generate full reports — release recaps, bug-trend summaries, architecture briefs — pulled straight from your repos, no `git log` required.

— Where it earns its keep

Three jobs GitHub search can't do.

Built for B2B SaaS teams whose GitHub is the engineering long-term memory but reads like a foreign language to anyone outside the dev team. These are the moments Archively pays for itself.

For founders
Know what shipped, in plain English.

Investor wants to know what got built last quarter? Stop asking your CTO to write the recap. Archively reads the merged PRs and release notes and gives you a clean summary you can actually use.

What major features did we ship in Q1?
For ops teams
Spot patterns, not symptoms.

Recurring incidents, repeat bug categories, the same dependency breaking twice a year — surfaced as patterns across issues, not buried as individual reports. Catch the systemic problem before it bites again.

What kinds of bugs have we re-opened more than twice this year?
For new engineers & cross-team leads
Onboard from the actual history.

New hire asks "why is auth structured this way?" — and gets the actual answer from the RFC, not a guess from someone who joined after it shipped. Cross-team leads can finally read the engineering history without a tour guide.

Why did we choose JWT over session cookies for the API?
— Get early access

Be first when Archively for GitHub opens.

Join the waitlist to be the first notified for early access. One confirmation email. No newsletters. No drip sequences. Just a note when access opens.

You're on the Archively waitlist! Check your email for confirmation.
No credit card · One email when we launch · Unsubscribe anytime